The episode has uncovered two parallel realities. On one hand, European leaders are coordinating extra intently than ever earlier than, counting on casual however extremely efficient channels to handle Trump-driven shocks. Alternatively, the Greenland dispute has additionally laid naked important divisions inside Europe over how far to confront the US and the way urgently to hunt compromise. Nevertheless, newest strikes counsel each European leaders and the Trump administration might be exploring off-ramps and prospects of a deal that works for both of them.
Additionally Learn: Trump tariff menace ‘poison’ for Germany’s fragile restoration
Inside European leaders’ chat group on Trump
In response to a current report by Politico, Western European leaders have spent a lot of Trump’s second time period quietly constructing a parallel system of coordination designed to operate with out US involvement. This effort grew out of earlier cooperation on Ukraine and has since hardened right into a standing crisis-management community. Politico describes a dense internet of contacts amongst nationwide safety advisers from greater than 30 nations, complemented by a a lot smaller, leader-level circle that operates by direct textual content messaging.
Prime ministers and presidents together with the UK’s Keir Starmer, France’s Emmanuel Macron, Germany’s Friedrich Merz, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, Finland’s Alexander Stubb, and European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen are stated to recurrently alternate messages — typically in the identical group chat — at any time when Trump takes actions seen as sudden or destabilising.
Additionally Learn: EU leaders take stage in Davos as Trump rocks international order
The group, informally often known as the “Washington Group,” takes its title from a joint go to these leaders made to the White Home with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy final 12 months. In response to Politico, the chat has grow to be a rapid-response device, permitting leaders to align positions in actual time when occasions transfer too rapidly for formal EU or NATO processes. Officers aware of the association informed the outlet that the effectiveness of the group displays unusually excessive ranges of non-public belief among the many leaders concerned.
Till now, the group’s guideline has been restraint, absorbing Trump’s rhetoric whereas responding calmly to concrete coverage strikes. That strategy, Politico notes, helped stabilise coordination on Ukraine and even contributed to progress on a peace framework that the U.S. finally endorsed. However Trump’s aggressive posture on Greenland has pushed the group towards a extra assertive stance, prompting even sometimes cautious figures like Starmer to instantly problem the White Home over threatened tariffs.
Additionally Learn: Trump threatens 200% tariffs on French wines to get Macron to affix Board of Peace
The completely different alerts from Europe
Publicly, Europe’s place on Greenland has been remarkably constant. European leaders, EU officers, and NATO companions have all pressured that Greenland’s sovereignty shouldn’t be negotiable and that its future lies solely with Greenlanders and the Kingdom of Denmark. Danish and Greenlandic officers have rejected any suggestion that financial stress or intimidation might alter that actuality.
On the similar time, European leaders are sending combined alerts on how to answer Trump’s ways. The European Fee has emphasised de-escalation, repeatedly stating that its precedence is engagement moderately than confrontation. Officers have underscored that whereas the EU has highly effective instruments together with retaliatory tariffs and its anti-coercion instrument, it might desire to not use them except completely vital.
Behind this cautious language lies a transparent strategic divide. France has traditionally favored a harder line towards US financial stress and has been extra open to signalling retaliation. Germany, against this, has urged warning. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has brazenly acknowledged {that a} commerce struggle with the US would hit Germany’s export-driven economic system notably onerous, and he has argued for a measured response designed to maintain dialogue open. “France is affected by the American tariffs to a distinct extent than we’re, and on this respect I perceive that the French authorities and the French president wish to react a little bit extra harshly than we do,” Merz stated. “However, we are attempting to undertake and can handle to discover a frequent place” earlier than EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday.
Additionally Learn: Trump shares new map of America together with Canada, Venezuela, Greenland
Italy and the UK have leaned towards restraint as properly, framing Trump’s threats as unacceptable however finest dealt with by direct engagement.
Even Macron now seems to be recalibrating, as evidenced by his outreach proposing multilateral talks following the World Financial Discussion board in Davos. Trump posted a textual content message from Macron wherein the French president steered a gathering of members of the Group of Seven industrialized democracies in Paris after the Davos gathering. Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni has already indicated a smooth strategy to Trump’s transfer on Greenland.
The EU’s overseas coverage chief Kaja Kallas stated Europe shouldn’t be curious about selecting a “combat” with the US over Trump’s Greenland ambitions, however the bloc will “maintain our floor,” A spokesperson for the European Fee stated the precedence amongst EU leaders is to “have interaction, not escalate, and keep away from the imposition of tariffs.” If tariffs are imposed, nevertheless, the EU “has instruments at its disposal and is ready to reply as a result of we’ll do all the pieces vital to guard EU financial pursuits,” he sai
As diplomacy intensifies, developments on the bottom in Greenland have raised the stakes. Denmark has begun reinforcing its navy presence on the island, formally to help joint workouts with NATO allies.
European officers see indicators of flexibility from Trump. In response to senior UK sources cited by CNN, the president acknowledged in a telephone name with Prime Minister Starmer that he might have been misinformed concerning the nature of European troop deployments. That admission has been interpreted in London and elsewhere as a possible opening to chill tensions, reinforcing the idea that private diplomacy nonetheless performs a vital position in managing the disaster.
Deal-making and doubts inside Trump’s camp
Reporting by CNN means that Trump’s public threats might masks important inner disagreement inside his personal administration. Whereas there’s broad consensus amongst his advisers that Greenland is strategically important for US nationwide safety, there’s far much less settlement on methods to safe American pursuits there.
In response to CNN, a number of senior advisers are skeptical of outright annexation and as an alternative favor increasing US affect by negotiated preparations. Reasonably than making Greenland a US state, they see worth in deeper navy cooperation, expanded basing rights, or new financial agreements that might successfully give Washington better management with out formally redrawing borders. The CNN report signifies that many in Trump’s circle view tariff threats as leverage moderately than an finish in themselves, a part of a stress marketing campaign designed to extract concessions from Denmark and its European companions. These concessions might embrace renegotiating the long-standing 1951 protection settlement governing US navy presence in Greenland or introducing stricter limits on Chinese language funding within the territory.
CNN additionally reported that some European leaders consider a deal stays doable. NATO Secretary Common Mark Rutte, who maintains shut ties to Trump, is alleged to be privately encouraging discussions round revised safety ensures that would give the US what it needs whereas preserving Danish sovereignty. Trump’s acknowledgment that he obtained defective details about European troop deployments has additional fuelled hopes that an off-ramp exists.
Strolling a skinny line between power and restraint
As European leaders collect in Davos and put together for an emergency summit in Brussels, they face a slim and precarious path. They need to show resolve with out frightening retaliation they’re unwilling or moderately unable to soak up. Europe’s rising behavior of casual coordination, exemplified by the Washington Group chat, has strengthened its capacity to reply rapidly and collectively. Nevertheless it can’t totally masks the underlying variations throughout the continent.
For now, Europe seems to be betting that calm engagement, private diplomacy and punctiliously modulated stress can steer Trump away from his most excessive calls for on Greenland. Whether or not that technique succeeds might rely much less on formal declarations than on the identical behind-the-scenes conversations — texts, calls and improvised compromises — that more and more outline transatlantic relations within the Trump period.
The EU has three main financial instruments it might use to stress Washington: new tariffs, suspension of the US-EU commerce deal, and a “commerce bazooka,” the unofficial time period for the bloc’s Anti-Coercion Instrument that would sanction people or establishments discovered to be placing undue stress on the EU. Trump’s handle to the World Financial Discussion board in Davos on Wednesday will assist decide the tone of Europe’s response to the US president’s tariff threats as leaders desperately seek for an off-ramp from the standoff. European governments are holding out hope they will decrease the temperature and get Trump to desert his vow to slap punitive tariffs on European nations which have opposed the sale of Greenland to the US.
(With inputs from companies)
