The accused was alleged to have posted derogatory remarks towards a caste neighborhood as properly.
Additional, he was accused of pretending to be a training advocate, regardless that he had but to finish his authorized research or enrol as an advocate with a Bar Council.
The primary info report (FIR) registered towards him cited provisions referring to selling enmity, hurting non secular sentiments and dishonest.
Justice Sumeet Goel on March 16 rejected the accused’s plea for pre-arrest bail, in view of the seriousness of the allegations towards him.
“In view of the gravity of the allegations, the function attributed to the petitioner, and the need of custodial interrogation for a good and thorough investigation, this Court docket is of the thought-about opinion that the petitioner doesn’t deserve the concession of anticipatory bail within the factual matrix of the case in hand. Furthermore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is important for an efficient investigation & to unravel the reality,” held the Court docket.
